Wachovia Bank, National Association v. L&H Investments, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Wachovia Bank, National Association
Defendant: L&H Investments, LLC, William G. Liddon, Jr. and Maxwell E. Hawker
Case Number: 1:2009cv00966
Filed: October 16, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office: Dothan Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Terry F. Moorer
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 24, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 28 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting Plaintiff Wachovia Bank, National Association's 25 Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment on Loans V and VII; that the Court finds summary judgment is appropriate for Loans/Notes V and VII in the amount of &# 036;13,595.40 which includes principal and interest accrued through the date of this Opinion; that including the additional interest on the other six loans previously granted, the new total amount for summary judgment due is $956,592.53; that the Court also finds summary judgment is appropriate as to attorney's fees in the amount of $62,671.04. Signed by Honorable Terry F. Moorer on 9/24/2010. (cc, )
July 27, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 23 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff Wachovia Bank, National Association's 15 MOTION for Summary Judgment; finding that summary judgment is appropriate for Loans/Notes I, II, III, IV, VI, and VIII in the amount of $936,862.31 which includes principal and interest accrued through the date of this Opinion; that Summary judgment is denied as to Loans/Notes V and VII; the Court ORDERS that Plaintiff Wachovia Bank may file a new motion for summary ju dgment as to those loans/notes on or before August 27, 2010 and said motion would be treated as a new motion for summary judgment and a briefing schedule would be issued where L&H would have the opportunity to respond to those issues remaining; deferring ruling on attorneys' fees until that time. Signed by Honorable Terry F. Moorer on 7/27/2010. (cc, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wachovia Bank, National Association v. L&H Investments, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wachovia Bank, National Association
Represented By: Eric Lloyd Pruitt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: L&H Investments, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William G. Liddon, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Maxwell E. Hawker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?