Egan (Jackson) v. Moss, et al. (INMATE 1)
| Clarence Earl Egan (Jackson) |
| Dave Sutton and Richard B. Moss |
| 1:2009cv01151 |
| December 21, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Dothan Office |
| Coffee |
| Truman M. Hobbs |
| Wallace Capel |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
ORDER re 30 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge ORDERING as follows: (a) the 30 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; (b) Defendants' 15 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED to the extent Defendants seek dismissal of this case due to Plaintiff's failure to exhaust administrative remedies previously available to him at the Coffee County Jail; and (c) this case is DISMISSED with prejudice, in accordance with the provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a), due to Plaintiff's failure to properly exhaust administrative remedies previously available to him at the Coffee County Jail. Signed by Honorable Truman M. Hobbs on 3/8/11. (scn, )
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; granting 2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order. Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk at Coffee County Jail. Signed by Honorable Wallace Capel, Jr. on 1/4/2010. (dmn)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
