Griffin v. Reed et al (INMATE 2)
||Christopher Desean Griffin
||Keith Reed, Asst Commander Brazire, Correction Officer Pipe, Correction Officer Cain, Sargeant Kersey and Luteneint Buchman
||January 4, 2010
||US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
||Charles S. Coody
||Ira De Ment
|Nature of Suit:
||Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition)
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|May 11, 2010
OPINION AND ORDER; This litigation is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge entered on April 19, 2010, 17 , that this case be dismissed without prejudice for the plaintiff's failure to comply with the orders of this court and his failure to properly prosecute this cause of action. After a review of the recommendation, to which no timely objections have been filed, and after an independent review of the entire record, the court believes that the re commendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that this case be and is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. An appropriate judgment will be entered. Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 5/11/2010. (jg, )
|January 12, 2010
ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; granting 2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order. Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk at Houston County Jail. Signed by Honorable Charles S. Coody on 1/12/2010. (jg, )
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?