Emojevwe v. United States of America (INMATE3)

Plaintiff: Robert Ovuorye Emojevwe
Defendant: United States of America
Case Number: 1:2010cv00229
Filed: March 15, 2010
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Dothan Office
0 Judge: Wallace Capel
Referring Judge: Wallace Capel
Presiding Judge: Mark E. Fuller
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28:2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 28, 2011 12 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE that: 1) The 11 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2) The 28 USC § 2255 motion is DENIED and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 10/28/2011. (wcl, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Emojevwe v. United States of America (INMATE3)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Ovuorye Emojevwe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Represented By: Matthew S. Miner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?