Tudor Insurance Company v. Title Pro Closings, LLC et al
| Tudor Insurance Company |
| Title Pro Closings, LLC, Tami Peters, Chester Nolin, Judy Nolin, Chris Cowart, Robert Peters, Bethanie Peters, Jacob Alvestad, Jacqui Burgoon and Bruce R. Hall |
| 1:2010cv00483 |
| May 28, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Dothan Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Susan Russ Walker |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
68
JUDGMENT; In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plaintiff Tudor Insurance Company's amended motion for default judgment 53 is granted. (2) Default judgme nt is entered in favor of plaintiff Tudor Insurance Company and against defendant Tammy Peters (3) It is DECLARED as to defendant Tammy Peters that plaintiff Tudor Insurance Company owes no duty to defend and indemnify her with respect to the various lawsuits that have been filed against her and that are the subject of this litigation. This declaration applies only as to defendant Tammy Peters and does not apply to the other defendants in this litigation. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 10/25/2010. (jg, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
