Stough v. Silva et al (INMATE2)
| Joseph David Stough |
| Troy Silva and William Maddox |
| 1:2010cv00883 |
| October 19, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Dothan Office |
| Henry |
| Charles S. Coody |
| Truman M. Hobbs |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: 1) The plf's 28 Objection to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is overruled; 2) The 27 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted; 3) The dfts' motions for summary judgment are GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice; and 4) Costs are taxed against plf for which execution may issue. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 9/25/2013. (wcl, )
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER; that on or before February 9, 2011 Plaintiff shall file a response to Defendants' 12 answer and written report as further set out. Signed by Honorable Charles S. Coody on 1/19/2011. (jg, )
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; granting 2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order. Copies mailed to plaintiff and inmate account clerk at the Kilby Correctional Facility. Signed by Honorable Charles S. Coody on 10/22/2010. (jg, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
