Pouncey v. City of Dothan et al (INMATE 2)

Plaintiff: Terrence Pouncey
Defendant: City of Dothan, Sadie Edwards and Rose Gorden
Case Number: 1:2011cv00010
Filed: January 5, 2011
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Dothan Office
County: Houston
Presiding Judge: Ira De Ment
Referring Judge: Wallace Capel
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 9, 2011 7 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER directing that, after a review of the 4 Recommendation, and after an independent review of the entire record, the Court believes that the Recommendation should be adopted; it is ORDERED as follows: (a) the Recommendation of the Magistrate Jud ge is ADOPTED; (b) the § 1983 claims presented against Defendants City of Dothan and Judge Gordon are DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (iii); (c) Plaintiff's § 1983 cla ims against Defendant Edwards are DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); (d) Plaintiff's challenge to the constitutionality of his current detention is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to the provisions o f 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) as such claim is not properly before the court at this time; and (e) this case is DISMISSED prior to service of process in accordance with the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(iii); a separate judgment shall issue. Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 2/9/11. (scn, )
January 19, 2011 3 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order; ORDERING that: (1) Plaintiff shall make monthly payments of 20 percent of each preceding month's income credited to his a ccount as payments towards the $350.00 filing fee; and (2) Those persons having custody of Plaintiff shall forward the above described payments from Plaintiff's account to the clerk of this court each time the amount in his account exceeds $10.00 until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full; DIRECTING Clerk to furnish a copy of this order to the inmate account clerk at the Dothan City Jail. Signed by Honorable Wallace Capel, Jr on 1/19/11. (Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk) (scn, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pouncey v. City of Dothan et al (INMATE 2)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Terrence Pouncey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Dothan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sadie Edwards
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rose Gorden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?