Shiver v. United States of America (INMATE3)

Justia Dockets & Filings Eleventh Circuit Alabama Middle District Shiver v. United States of America (INMATE3)

Shiver v. United States of America (INMATE3)

Plaintiff:	Gregory James Shiver
Defendant:	United States of America
Case Number:	1:2011cv00179
Filed:	March 15, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office:	Dothan Office
County:	XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:	Charles S. Coody
Presiding Judge:	Mark E. Fuller
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 27, 2014	Filing 54 ORDER directing that, after an independent review of the file, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: (1) The petitioner's Objections and Amendment to Objection to the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (Doc. # 38 , # 49 , a nd # 53 ) are overruled; (2) The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 35 ) entered on June 25, 2013 is adopted; (3) The 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion filed by Shiver is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 1/27/14. (scn, )
August 23, 2013	Filing 39 ORDER directing that, after an independent review of the file, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: (1) The petitioner's 38 Objection to the Magistrate Judge Recommendation is overruled; (2) The 35 Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge is adopted; (3) The 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion filed by Shiver is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 8/23/13. (scn, )

Date Filed

Document Text

January 27, 2014

Filing 54 ORDER directing that, after an independent review of the file, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: (1) The petitioner's Objections and Amendment to Objection to the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (Doc. # 38 , # 49 , a nd # 53 ) are overruled; (2) The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 35 ) entered on June 25, 2013 is adopted; (3) The 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion filed by Shiver is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 1/27/14. (scn, )

August 23, 2013

Filing 39 ORDER directing that, after an independent review of the file, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: (1) The petitioner's 38 Objection to the Magistrate Judge Recommendation is overruled; (2) The 35 Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge is adopted; (3) The 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion filed by Shiver is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 8/23/13. (scn, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shiver v. United States of America (INMATE3)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Represented By:	Nathan D. Stump
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gregory James Shiver
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?