Employers Mutual Casualty Company v. Carl Hobbs Construction Company, Inc. et al
| Employers Mutual Casualty Company |
| Carl Hobbs Construction Company, Inc., Carl Hobbs, Donald Trawick, David Alford and Caroline Alford |
| 1:2011cv00643 |
| August 11, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Dothan Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Mark E. Fuller |
| Susan Russ Walker |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
73
ORDER that Defendants' Motion to Continue Trial 71 is GRANTED, and thus, trial of the instant case is continued generally. Further, the parties are ORDERED to file their joint stipulation of dismissal by Friday, November 30, 2012. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 10/30/2012. (jg, ) TERMINATED: Non-Jury Trial 11/05/2012
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER that the Court finds the Construction Company Defendants' Partially Opposed 61 Motion to Continue Trial is due to be and hereby is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 10/17/2012. (jg, )
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER that oral argument is set for 36 , 54 , 55 motions on October 12, 2012, at 9:00 A.M. in Courtroom 2A, United States Courthouse, Montgomery, Alabama; that the pretrial hearing currently set in this matter will immediately follow oral argument on the above motions. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 10/10/2012. (jg, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
