Womack v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Plaintiff: Marsha Womack
Defendant: J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Case Number: 1:2011cv00927
Filed: October 28, 2011
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Dothan Office
County: Houston
0 Judge: W. Harold Albritton
1 Judge: Wallace Capel
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 9, 2013 80 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER: The Motion to Strike 60 is DENIED. The Plaintiff is given until January 17, 2013 to file a supplemental brief as further set out. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 1/9/2013. (jg, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Womack v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marsha Womack
Represented By: Joseph Anthony Morris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Represented By: Sandra Grisham Robinson
Represented By: Michael Elliott Turner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?