Eatmon v. Pilgrim Pride Chicken Plant et al(INMATE 2)

Plaintiff: Jamie Eatmon
Defendant: Dr. Doshia, Dr. Diaz, Sharon Hollard, Mrs Baker, Mrs. Lockhart and Pilgrim Pride Chicken Plant
Case Number: 1:2011cv01002
Filed: November 23, 2011
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Dothan Office
County: Montgomery
Referring Judge: Charles S. Coody
Presiding Judge: Truman M. Hobbs
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 17, 2012 52 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION and ORDER adopting 49 Report and Recommendations; granting plaintiff's 48 , 50 and 51 Motions to Dismiss; dismissing this case without prejudice, and that no costs are TAXED. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 7/17/2012. (cc, )
April 17, 2012 42 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION and ORDER re 29 Recommendation. It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED; 2. The Plaintiff's complaint against Defendants Pilgrim's Pride Chicken Plant and Mr. John be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); 3. Defendants Pilgrims Pride Chicken Plant and Mr. John be and are hereby DISMISSED as parties to the complaint; and 4. This case with respect to the remaining defendants be and is hereby REFERRED BACK to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 4/17/2012. (dmn, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Eatmon v. Pilgrim Pride Chicken Plant et al(INMATE 2)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dr. Doshia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dr. Diaz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sharon Hollard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mrs Baker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mrs. Lockhart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pilgrim Pride Chicken Plant
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jamie Eatmon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?