J.S. v. The Houston County Board of Education et al
| J.S., III |
| Timothy Pitchford, Cheryl Smith, The Houston County Board of Education, Andrew T. Faircloth and Alicia Brown |
| 1:2012cv00666 |
| August 6, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Dothan Office |
| Houston |
| Mark E. Fuller |
| Terry F. Moorer |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
120
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER as follows: 1. The Houston County Board of Education's 90 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs' ADA and § 504 claims as alleged in Count I of the amended complaint are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. This ruling resolves all pending claims in this action, and the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close the file. 2. The Houston County Board of Educations 88 Motion to Exclude the Expert Opinion and Testimony of Don Mosley and 86 Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c)(2) Objection to Evidence are DENIED as MOOT. 3. The pretrial hearing and trial in this matter are CANCELLED. A final judgment consistent with this Memorandum Opinion and Order is forthcoming. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 7/8/2014. Copies furnished to calendar group, WR. (dmn, ) (Deadlines terminated: Final Pretrial Conference set for 7/10/2014 and Jury Trial set for 8/18/2014.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
