Davidson v. McSwain-Holland et al (INMATE 2)
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|February 12, 2015
ORDERED as follows: 1. Mr. Davidson's 37 objection is OVERRULED. 2. The 36 Recommendation is ADOPTED. 3. Mr. Davidson's 18 Motion to Dismiss Defendant Smith-James is GRANTED, and Defendant Smith-James is DISMISSED with prejudice. 4. Defendants Sharon McSwain-Holland's and Jesse Youngblood's 15 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. 5. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 2/12/2015. (kh, )
|July 16, 2014
ORDER AND OPINION: it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the 23 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for plf's failures to prosecute this action properly and to comply with the orders of this court. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 7/16/2014. (wcl, )
|September 14, 2012
ORDER that: 1. The petitioner's objection 12 to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed on September 7, 2012 is overruled; 2. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge 9 filed on August 27, 2012 is adopted; Plaintiff's clai ms against the Alabama Department of Corrections is DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). 4. The Alabama Department of Corrections is DISMISSED as a party to this complaint. 5. This case with respect to the remaining defendants is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for additional proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 9/14/2012. (jg, )
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?