Daniels v. Hanger Orthopedic Group, Inc.

Defendant: Hanger Orthopedic Group, Inc.
Plaintiff: Briana C. Daniels
Case Number: 1:2012cv00878
Filed: October 11, 2012
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Dothan Office
County: Geneva
Presiding Judge: Mark E. Fuller
Referring Judge: Susan Russ Walker
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 10, 2013 25 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 23 Motion for Leave to Amend Her Complaint; Plf shall file, on or before 6/14/2013, an amended complaint that complies with Rule 15.1 of the Local Rules, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 6/10/2013. (wcl, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Daniels v. Hanger Orthopedic Group, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hanger Orthopedic Group, Inc.
Represented By: Kelly Dana Reese
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Briana C. Daniels
Represented By: Adam Michael Porter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?