Wonders v. McHugh (MAG+)

Plaintiff: Mark Geraghty Wonders
Defendant: John McHugh
Case Number: 1:2013cv00940
Filed: December 23, 2013
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Dothan Office
County: Dale
Presiding Judge: William Keith Watkins
Referring Judge: Wallace Capel
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 26, 2014 20 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER directing that, upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the 17 Recommendation, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and that this case is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 8/26/14. (scn, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wonders v. McHugh (MAG+)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John McHugh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mark Geraghty Wonders
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?