Shiver v. Education Affiliates, Inc.

Plaintiff: Stacie Lashay Shiver
Defendant: Education Affiliates, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2014cv01165
Filed: November 20, 2014
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Dothan Office
County: Houston
Referring Judge: Susan Russ Walker
Presiding Judge: W. Harold Albritton
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 6, 2016 85 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing that the defendants 73 MOTION in Limine and the plf's 79 MOTION in Limine be and are hereby GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 1/6/16. (djy, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shiver v. Education Affiliates, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stacie Lashay Shiver
Represented By: Heather Newsom Leonard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Education Affiliates, Inc.
Represented By: Peter Sean Fruin
Represented By: Stephanie H. Mays
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?