Young v. De Fazio et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG2)
Ronda Young |
Steven Joseph De Fazio, Cape Environmental Management, Inc., GEICO Indemnity Company and GEICO Casualty Company |
1:2016cv00713 |
August 30, 2016 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Dothan Office |
Dale |
Paul W. Greene |
Myron H. Thompson |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 JUDGMENT: It is ORDERED that: (1) The 17 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal is construed as a Motion to Dismiss Defendants GEICO Indemnity Company and GEICO Casualty Company without prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(2), and the motion is granted. (2) All claims against defendants GEICO Indemnity Company and GEICO Casualty Company are dismissed without prejudice, with costs taxed as paid, and said defendants are terminated as parties. All claims against all other defendants remain pending. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to FRCP 58. The court assumes that there is no objection to the allowance of the dismissal; however, if there is an objection, it must be filed within seven days from the date of this order. This case is referred back to the United States Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 11/28/2016. (dmn, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.