Russaw v. Jones et al (INMATE 3)
| Fitzgerald Russaw |
| Karla Jones and The Attorney General of the State of Alabama |
| 1:2017cv00076 |
| February 9, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Dothan Office |
| Barbour |
| Susan Russ Walker |
| William Keith Watkins |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
OPINION AND ORDER: On 4/26/2019, the Petitioner filed a pro se Notice of Appeal (Doc. 20 ) and Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis (Doc. 21 ) which the court construes as containing a Motion for Certificate of Appealability. For the rea sons as further stated in the opinion and order, the appeal in this cause be and is hereby certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a), as not taken in good faith, and the motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis and motion for a certificate of appealability (Doc. 21 ) be and are hereby DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 5/13/2019. Furnished Appeals Clerk.(dmn, )
|
|
Filing
18
OPINION and ORDER: ORDERED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED, the Petitioner's objections be and are hereby OVERRULED, the petition for writ of habeas corpus filed by Russaw on November 14, 2016, be and is hereby DENIED, and the petition be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 3/25/2019. (kh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
