Lett v. Tew (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)

Plaintiff: Lavedrice Lett
Defendant: Terry Tew
Case Number: 1:2017cv00155
Filed: March 17, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office: Dothan Office
County: Geneva
Referring Judge: Terry F. Moorer
Presiding Judge: William Keith Watkins
Nature of Suit: Housing/Accommodations
Cause of Action: 42:3601
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER directing as follows: (1) ADOPTING 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge; and (2) this case is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to the Younger abstention doctrine and for plf's failure to prosecute this action. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 9/13/17. (djy, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lett v. Tew (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lavedrice Lett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Terry Tew
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?