Pearson v. The Commercial Bank of Ozark et al (JOINT ASSIGN) (MAG+)
Plaintiff: Lorenzo Pearson
Defendant: The Commercial Bank of Ozark, Commercial Bank of Ozark, Commercial Bancshares of Ozark, Inc., Larry Ezell, Robert H. Brogden, Ranier Cotter, III, State of Alabama and Circuit Court of Dale County
Case Number: 1:2017cv00687
Filed: October 12, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office: Dothan Office
County: Dale
Presiding Judge: Terry F. Moorer
Presiding Judge: William Keith Watkins
Nature of Suit: Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations
Cause of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: 1) Plf's 11 objection is OVERRULED; 2) The 10 Recommendation is ADOPTED; 3) Plf's claims against The Commercial Bank of Ozark, Commercial Bank of Ozark, Commercial Bancshares of Ozark, Inc., and State of Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure are DISMISSED with prejudice; 4) Plf Lorenzo Pearson is again ENJOINED from filing any more notices of removal or direct suits in this court against The Commercial Bank of Ozark or its agents, servants, employees, officers, or directors, unless he complies with the following procedures, as further set out in order; DIRECTING the Clerk to forward to the undersigned any such petition and its accompanying documents for consideration, as further set out in order; If Lorenzo Pearson fails to comply with the court's directive by submitting a notice of removal or complaint involving The Commercial Bank of Ozark (or any of its agents, servants, employees, officers, or directors) without complying with this Order, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to return the notice of removal or complaint to him or her; Further, if Lorenzo Pearson fails to submit the required petition for leave to file, along with the complaint or notice of removal in a case in whic h The Commercial Bank of Ozark, or any of its agents, servants, employees, officers, or directors is a party, he may be held in contempt of court and may be subject to sanctions, including monetary sanctions to offset the court's administrative costs (including return postage) and/or any opposing party's costs incurred as a result of his failure to comply with the orders of the court. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 5/10/2018. (wcl, )
December 18, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER DIRECTING the Clerk to send to Plf the long affidavit form; Further ORDERED that Plf file this Affidavit on or before 1/3/2018; Copy of long affidavit form mailed to Plf as directed. Signed by Honorable Judge Terry F. Moorer on 12/18/2017. (alm, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pearson v. The Commercial Bank of Ozark et al (JOINT ASSIGN) (MAG+)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lorenzo Pearson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Commercial Bank of Ozark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commercial Bank of Ozark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commercial Bancshares of Ozark, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Larry Ezell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert H. Brogden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ranier Cotter, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of Alabama
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Circuit Court of Dale County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?