Brand v. Henry County Board of Education et al
| Dennis L. Brand, Sr. |
| Henry County Board of Education, Lesa Knowles and Chris Padget |
| 1:2017cv00823 |
| December 6, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Dothan Office |
| Henry |
| Gray M. Borden |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
66
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: the Board's 57 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Signed by Honorable Judge Andrew L. Brasher on 2/24/2020. (bes, )
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER: Pending before the court is a 18 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Defendants Lesa Knowles and Chris Padget. The complaint filed by counsel for Dennis Brand brings claims against Knowles, Padget, and the Henry Coun ty Board of Education, but the Board answered the complaint and does not join in the pending motion to dismiss. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff has until 7/23/2018 to file an amended complaint as further set out in the order. The amended complaint sho uld be complete unto itself and should not incorporate by reference any earlier complaint. Failure to file an amended complaint within the time allowed may result in a recommendation of dismissal of Brands claims against Defendants Knowles and Padget. Signed by Honorable Judge Gray M. Borden on 7/9/2018. (dmn, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
