Southern Pioneer Property & Casualty Insurance Company v. Newsome
| Southern Pioneer Property & Casualty Insurance Company |
| Terry Newsome and Terry Newsome doing business as Chazz Automotive |
| 1:2018cv00461 |
| May 2, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Dothan Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Charles S Coody |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
CONSENT JUDGMENT AND ORDER: Accordingly, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the Motion (16) is GRANTED and judgment is hereby ENTERED as follows: 1. That there is a bona fide controversy between the parties as to their legal rights, duties, status, and liability; 2. That the subject insurance policy (No. CP00006661) (the "subject policy") issued to Terry Newsome d/b/a Chazz Automotive is void ab initio; 3. That Southern Pioneer has a right to rescind the subject policy accord ingly; 4. That, because the Policy is rescinded and void ab initio, Southern Pioneer has no coverage obligations under the Policy for any claims made against any insured; 5. That the subject policy is hereby rescinded; 6. That this final judgment is hereby ENTERED against Defendant and in favor of the Plaintiff; and 7. That costs be taxed as paid. Signed by Honorable Judge Gray M. Borden on 12/27/2018. (kh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
