United States of America v. Daniel et al (MAG+)
| United States of America |
| Patricia Daniel |
| Premier Kings, Inc. |
| 1:2018mc03815 |
| March 9, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Dothan Office |
| Houston |
| Gray M. Borden |
| Myron H. Thompson |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| Application for a Writ of Garnishment |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
DISPOSITION ORDER directing that: (1) Garnishee Premier Kings, Inc. shall withhold $ 50 per month from def Patricia Daniel's net bi-weekly pay and shall promptly remit the identified nonexempt funds every pay period to the clerk, as fur ther set out; (2) The clerk of court shall apply these funds to the restitution balance owed by def Daniel in case 1:16-cr-00218-WKW (M.D. Ala.); (3) This garnishment order shall remain in effect until satisfaction of the debt owed to plf United S tates of America; until def Daniel ceases employment with garnishee Premier Kings, Inc. (unless garnishee reinstates or reemploys def within 90 days after the def's dismissal or resignation); or until the court issues an order quashing the writ of continuing garnishment; (4) Plf United States of America shallpromptly notify the court, def Daniel, and garnishee Premier Kings, Inc. upon satisfaction of thedebt.; this case is administratively closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 4/30/18. (djy, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
