Balcom v. Valenza et al (INMATE 1)
| Ronald Devone Balcom |
| Assistant Commander Moore, Ms. Reece, Ms. Howell, Houston County Health Department, Keith A. Hicks, Lt. King, Donald Valenza, Ms. Margaret and Commander Brazier |
| 1:2019cv00264 |
| April 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| W Harold Albritton |
| Charles S Coody |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER: 1) OVERRULING the #7 Objection filed by the plaintiff on 6/6/2019; 2) DENYING reconsideration, to the extent the plaintiff seeks reconsideration of the #5 Order adopting the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and the #6 Final Judgement both entered on 4/19/2019; 3) the Order adopting the #5 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and the #6 Final Judgement remain in full force and effect. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 6/7/2019. (am, )
|
| MOTION for Reconsideration re #5 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations & #6 Judgment, docketed pursuant to #8 Order. ( NO PDF attached to this etnry - see doc #7 ) (am, ) |
| Filing 7 OBJECTION to #3 Recommendation of Magistrate Judge, filed by Ronald Devone Balcom. (am, ) (Main Document 7 replaced on 6/21/2019) (am, ). Modified on 6/21/2019 to replace correctly scanned pages (am, ). |
|
Filing 6
FINAL JUDGMENT: In accordance with the order entered on this date adopting the #3 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, Final Judgement is entered in favor of the Defendants and against the Plaintiff and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice; DIRECTING the Clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a Final Judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the FRCP. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 4/19/2019. (Attachments: #1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(am, )
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER: 1)OVERRULING #4 Objection to Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge ; 2) ADOPTING #3 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge; 3) DENYING #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; 4) DISMISSING this case without prejudice in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) for Balcom's failure to pay the full filing fee upon initiation of this case; a separate Final Judgment will be entered. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 4/19/2019. (am, )
|
| Filing 4 OBJECTION to #3 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed by Ronald Devone Balcom. (am, ) |
| Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that: (1) the #2 motion for leave to Proceed in forma pauperis be DENIED; (2) this case be DISMISSED without prejudice for Balcom's failure to pay the full filing fee upon the initiation of this case; Objections to R&R due by 4/26/2019. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 4/12/19. (djy, ) |
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by Ronald Devone Balcom. (beh, ) |
| Filing 1 Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against Commander Brazier, Keith A. Hicks, Houston County Health Department, Ms. Howell, Lt. King, Ms. Margaret, Assistant Commander Moore, Ms. Reece, Donald Valenza, filed by Ronald Devone Balcom.(beh, ) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Ronald Devone Balcom. (NO PDF Document attached to this notice-See Docket entry #1 ).(djy, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
