Fabian v. City of Dothan et al
Carlos Hinojosa Fabian |
Tom Davis and City of Dothan |
1:2019cv00283 |
April 19, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Wallace Capel |
Emily C Marks |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER: it is ORDERED that jury selection and jury trial set on 7/20/2020 in Dothan, Alabama be and is hereby RESET to non-jury trial on that date in Dothan; All other dates in the scheduling order remain in effect and unchanged. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 6/10/2019. (Furn: Calendar, WS)(kr, ) |
Filing 10 UNIFORM SCHEDULING ORDER: on-the-record Pretrial Conference set for 6/11/2020 at 11:00 AM in CR 2A before Chief Judge Emily C. Marks; Proposed Pretrial Order due by 6/4/2020; Jury Selection and Trial set for 7/20/2020 at 10:00 AM in Dothan, Alabama before Chief Judge Emily C. Marks; Dispositive and Daubert Motions due by 12/13/2019; Mediation Notice due by 11/18/2019; Amended Pleadings due by 8/5/2019; Discovery due by 11/13/2019, as further set out in order. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 5/30/2019. (Furn: Calendar, WS)(kr, ) Modified on 6/5/2019 to clarify the docket text to reflect PTC on-the-record (cnw, ). |
Filing 9 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (White, Freddie) |
Filing 8 Case Reassigned to Chief Judge Emily C. Marks as Presiding Judge and Honorable Judge Wallace Capel, Jr as Referral Judge; Honorable Judge Wallace Capel, Jr no longer assigned to the case as Presiding Judge. (alm, ) |
Filing 7 ORDER: it is ORDERED that the Rule 26(f) report containing the discovery plan shall be filed as soon as practicable, as further set out in order; Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 5/29/2019; any party wishing to consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction shall complete the appropriate attached form so that theform is received by the Clerk on or before 5/29/2019, as further set out in order; Do NOT electronically file the consent form nor reassignment form into the record. Signed by Honorable Judge Wallace Capel, Jr on 5/8/2019. (cnw, ) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by City of Dothan, Tom Davis.(White, Freddie) Modified on 5/1/2019 to clarify text (cnw, ). |
Filing 5 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Tom Davis. (White, Freddie) Modified on 4/24/2019 to clarify text to reflect as satisfying #3 notice of deficiency (cnw, ). |
Filing 4 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by City of Dothan. (White, Freddie) Modified on 4/24/2019 to clarify text to reflect as satisfying #3 notice of deficiency (cnw, ). |
Filing 3 Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement sent to City of Dothan and Tom Davis; Corporate Disclosures due by 5/6/2019. (Attachments: #1 Conflict Disclosure Statement)(cnw, ) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge sent to counsel for City of Dothan, Tom Davis, Carlos Hinojosa Fabian (all parties). (cnw, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by City of Dothan, Tom Davis from Circuit Court of Houston County, case number 38-cv-2019-900152. ( Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number 4602053309) (Attachments: #1 State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit 1- State Court Record, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 receipt)(cnw, ) |
COMPLAINT against City of Dothan, Tom Davis, filed by Carlos Hinojosa Fabian. (No pdf attached to this entry - see doc #1 for pdf)(cnw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.