Brown v. Bradley (INMATE 1)
Charles Edward Brown |
James Bradley |
1:2019cv00363 |
May 23, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
W Harold Albritton |
Charles S Coody |
Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE: it is the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that this case be dismissed without prejudice; Objections to R&R due by 7/30/2019. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 7/16/2019. (kr, ) |
Mail Returned as Undeliverable; #17 Order sent to Charles Edward Brown was returned with the following notation, "Return To Sender, Not Deliverable As Addressed, Unable To Forward." (No pdf attached to this entry) (kr, ) |
|
Mail Returned as Undeliverable. #14 Order, #15 Order, #16 Order mailed to Charles Edward Brown returned by USPS with the following notation, "UTF, Return to Sender, Not Deliverable as Addressed, Unable to Forward." (dmn, ) (NO PDF) |
|
|
|
Filing 13 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by James Bradley. (Pike, James) |
Filing 12 MOTION to Stay (Suspend) re #5 Order to file special report within 40 days of the date of this order by James Bradley. (Pike, James) Modified on 6/28/2019 to clarify text (kr, ). |
Filing 11 MOTION to Vacate #5 Order to file special report within 40 days of the date of this order , MOTION for Leave to File Motion to Dismiss; In the Alternative, MOTION for Extension of Time to File Special Report & Answer re #1 Inmate 1983 Complaint by James Bradley. (Pike, James) |
AO FORM 85 mailed to counsel for James Bradley. (No pdf attached to this entry) (kr, ) |
|
Filing 9 MOTION for Status by Charles Edward Brown. (kr, ) |
|
Filing 7 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Charles Edward Brown. (kr, ) Modified on 6/5/2019 to clarify text (kr, ). |
Filing 6 Return Receipt Card showing service of #1 Inmate 1983 Complaint and #5 Order signed by Katie Bowen for James Bradley served on 5/28/2019, answer due 7/8/2019. (kr, ) |
|
|
|
MOTION for information, as construed in the Court's #4 Order by Charles Edward Brown. (No pdf attached to this entry - see doc #1 for pdf) (cnw, ) |
Filing 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by Charles Edward Brown. (arc, ) |
Filing 1 Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against James Bradley, filed by Charles Edward Brown. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents)(arc, ) construed to contain a motion for information Modified on 5/24/2019 (cnw, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Brown v. Bradley (INMATE 1) | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Charles Edward Brown | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: James Bradley | |
Represented By: | James Hillary Pike |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.