Harper v. Daughtry et al
| Jessica Harper |
| Mildred Daughtry and James T. Greer, Jr. |
| 1:2019cv00463 |
| July 1, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Stephen Michael Doyle |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12181 Americans |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Return Receipt Card showing service of Summons, #1 Complaint signed by Mildred Daughtry for: Mildred Daughtry served on 8/5/2019, answer due 8/26/2019; James T. Greer, Jr served on 8/5/2019, answer due 8/26/2019. (kr, ) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Mildred Daughtry, James T. Greer, Jr.; mailed CMRRR with copy of #1 complaint. (kr, ) |
Filing 5
ORDER: it is ORDERED that Plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. Signed by Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 8/2/2019. (kr, )
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge sent to counsel for Jessica Harper. (kr, ) |
| Filing 3 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Jessica Harper. (kr, ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jessica Harper. (Attachments: #1 Application to Proceed IFP)(kr, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mildred Daughtry, James T. Greer, Jr, filed by Jessica Harper. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(kr, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
