Pierce v. Cobb et al (INMATE 2)
Plaintiff: LaShawn Dysan Pierce
Defendant: Officer Hunt, Dothan Police Department and Officer Cobb
Case Number: 1:2019cv00576
Filed: August 12, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Andrew L Brasher
Referring Judge: Charles S Coody
Nature of Suit: Mandamus & Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 FINAL JUDGMENT: In accordance with the prior proceedings, opinions, and orders of the court, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that this action is DISMISSED in accordance with the order entered on this date. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable Judge Andrew L. Brasher on 10/1/2019. (Attachments: #1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(kh, )
October 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDERED that the #10 Recommendation is ADOPTED, and that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failures to comply with the order of the court and to prosecute this action. A Final Judgment will be entered separately. (kh, )
September 27, 2019 No objections filed to the #10 Recommendation. (No pdf attached to this entry) (wcl, )
September 20, 2019 Mail Returned as Undeliverable; #9 Order sent to LaShawn Dysan Pierce was returned with the following notation, "Return To Sender, Not At This Address." (No pdf attached to this entry) (wcl, )
September 6, 2019 Filing 10 RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE: it is the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge this case be DISMISSED without prejudice for Plf's failure to prosecute this action; Objections to R&R due by 9/20/2019. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 9/6/2019. (wcl, )
September 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: the #5 Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED that: 1) Plf's claims against Dft Dothan Police Department are DISMISSED with prejudice under 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); 2) The Dothan Police Department is TERMINATED as a party to the complaint; DIRECTING the Clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP as to Dft Dothan Police Department; This case is not closed and is referred to the United States Magistrate Judge for further proceedings regarding Plf's claims against the remaining dfts. Signed by Honorable Judge Andrew L. Brasher on 9/6/2019. (Attachments: #1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (wcl, )
September 4, 2019 No objections filed to the #5 Recommendation. (No pdf attached to this entry)(wcl, )
August 30, 2019 Mail Returned as Undeliverable; #6 Order sent to LaShawn Dysan Pierce was returned with the following notation, "Return To Sender, Attempted - Not Known, Unable To Forward." (No pdf attached to this entry) (wcl, )
August 27, 2019 Mail Returned as Undeliverable; #7 Order sent to LaShawn Dysan Pierce was returned with the following notation, "Return To Sender." (No pdf attached to this entry) (wcl, )
August 26, 2019 Filing 8 Return Receipt Card showing service of #1 Inmate 1983 Complaint and #4 Order signed by Natalie Stonestreet for: Officer Cobb served on 8/22/2019, answer due 9/24/2019; Officer Hunt served on 8/22/2019, answer due 9/24/2019. (wcl, )
August 23, 2019 Mail Returned as Undeliverable; #5 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge sent to LaShawn Dysan Pierce was returned with the following notation, "Return To Sender, Attempted - Not Known, Unable To Forward." (No pdf attached to this entry) (wcl, )
August 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: it is ORDERED that Dfts shall file no response to the complaint unless and until further order of the court; copies mailed to Plf at his last known address and to Dfts as directed. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 8/21/2019. (wcl, )
August 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: it is ORDERED that on or before 8/30/2019, Plf shall file with the court a current address and/or show cause why this case should not be dismissed for his failure to adequately prosecute this action, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 8/20/2019. (wcl, )
August 20, 2019 Mail Returned as Undeliverable; Service packages containing #4 Order and #1 Inmate 1983 Complaint sent CMRRR to Officer Hunt and Officer Cobb (c/o Houston County Jail) were returned with the following notation, "Return To Sender, Insufficient Address, Unable To Forward." (Service packages have been re-mailed CMRRR to Dfts c/o Dothan Police Department) (wcl, )
August 19, 2019 Mail Returned as Undeliverable; #3 and #4 Orders sent to LaShawn Dysan Pierce were returned with the following notation, "Return To Sender, Not At This Address." (No pdf attached to this entry) (wcl, )
August 14, 2019 Filing 5 RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE: it is the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that: 1) Plf's claims against the Dothan Police Department be DISMISSED with prejudice under 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); 2) The Dothan Police Department be TERMINATED as a party to the complaint; 3) This case be referred to the undersigned for further proceedings; Objections to R&R due by 8/28/2019. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 8/14/2019. (wcl, )
August 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER TO FILE SPECIAL REPORT AND ANSWER on or before 9/24/2019; copies mailed to plf; mailed by CMRRR with complaint and any and all attachments to Dfts Cobb and Hunt. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 8/13/2019. (wcl, )
August 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER ON MOTION granting #2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; Copies mailed to plf and account clerk at Houston County Jail. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 8/13/2019. (furn: cashier) (wcl, )
August 12, 2019 Filing 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by LaShawn Dysan Pierce. (bes, )
August 12, 2019 Filing 1 Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against Officer Cobb, Dothan Police Department, Officer Hunt, filed by LaShawn Dysan Pierce.(bes, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pierce v. Cobb et al (INMATE 2)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officer Hunt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dothan Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officer Cobb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LaShawn Dysan Pierce
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?