Rogers v. Howell et al (INMATE 1)
| Jackie Allen Rogers |
| Jeb Howell and City of Dothan Police Department |
| 1:2019cv01071 |
| December 23, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Dothan Office |
| Andrew L Brasher |
| Stephen Michael Doyle |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDERED that this #13 motion be and is hereby GRANTED. Signed by Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 2/18/2020. (kh, )
|
| Filing 13 MOTION to File exhibit conventionally by Jackie Allen Rogers. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-3 CD to Docket entry #8 filed conventionally)(djy, ) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER: it is ORDERED that on or before 3/10/2020 the dfts shall file a supplement to their special report which addresses the plf's claims that he was subjected to a false arrest, false imprisonment and malicious prosecution as the charges for which he was arrested by defendant Howell were dismissed on 11/5/2019. Signed by Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 2/13/2020. (wcl, )
|
| Filing 11 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by City of Dothan Police Department. (White, Freddie) |
| Filing 10 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Jeb Howell. (White, Freddie) |
| Filing 9 Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement sent to Jeb Howell, City of Dothan Police Department; Corporate Disclosures due by 2/24/2020. (Attachments: #1 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Attachment)(wcl, ) |
| Filing 8 Special Report to Inmate 1983 Complaint by City of Dothan Police Department, Jeb Howell. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit A-1, #3 Exhibit A-2, #4 Exhibit A-3, #5 Exhibit A-4, #6 Exhibit A-5, #7 Exhibit A-6, #8 Exhibit A-7, #9 Exhibit A-8, #10 Exhibit A-9, #11 Exhibit A-10, #12 Exhibit A-11, #13 Exhibit A-12, #14 Exhibit B, #15 Exhibit C)(White, Freddie) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by City of Dothan Police Department, Jeb Howell.(White, Freddie) |
| AO FORM 85 mailed to counsel for City of Dothan Police Department, Jeb Howell. (No pdf attached to this entry) (wcl, ) |
| Filing 6 Return Receipt Card showing service of #1 Complaint and #4 Order signed by D.C for City of Dothan Police Department served on 1/10/2020, answer due 2/18/2020. (kh, ) |
| Filing 5 Return Receipt Card showing service of #1 Complaint and #4 Order signed by D.C. for Jeb Howell served on 1/9/2020, answer due 2/18/2020.(kh, ) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER TO FILE SPECIAL REPORT AND ANSWER on or before February 18, 2020; copies mailed to plaintiff; mailed by CMRRR with complaint to named defendants. Signed by Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 1/7/2020. (kh, )
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk @ Houston County Jail. Signed by Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 1/7/2020. (furn: acct clerk, cashier)(kh, )
|
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by Jackie Allen Rogers. (bes, ) |
| Filing 1 Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against City of Dothan Police Department, Jeb Howell, filed by Jackie Allen Rogers.(bes, ) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Jackie Allen Rogers. (No PDF attached to this entry - see doc #1 for PDF) (bes, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
