Pitts v. Howard (INMATE 1)
Joseph Pitts and Joseph Alexander Pitts |
Mrs. Howard |
1:2020cv00115 |
February 19, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Stephen Michael Doyle |
William Keith Watkins |
Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Return Receipt Card showing service of #1 Complaint & #4 Order, signed by Natalie Fears for Mrs. Howard, served on 3/13/2020, answer due 4/3/2020. (amf, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER TO FILE SPECIAL REPORT AND ANSWER on or before 4/3/2020; copies mailed to plf; mailed by CMRRR with #1 complaint to the dft. Signed by Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 2/21/2020. (amf, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER ON MOTION: ORDER granting #2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; Copies mailed to plf and account clerk at Houston County Jail. Signed by Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 2/21/2020. (Furnished: Cashier) (amf, ) |
Filing 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by Joseph Pitts. (imm, ) |
Filing 1 Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against Mrs. Howard, filed by Joseph Pitts.(imm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.