McKenzie v. Saul (CONSENT)
Plaintiff: Willie McKenzie
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Case Number: 1:2020cv00118
Filed: February 20, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Susan Russ Walker
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Return Receipt Card showing service of Summons, #1 Complaint, & #3 Order, signed by Social Security Administration for Andrew Saul, served on 3/8/2020. (amf, )
March 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Return Receipt Card showing service of Summons, #1 Complaint, & #3 Order, signed by Emily Sase for U.S. Attorney General, served on 3/10/2020. (amf, )
March 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Return Receipt Card showing service of Summons, #1 Complaint, & #3 Order, signed by Cassandra Whyte for Social Security Office of Regional Counsel, served on 3/4/2020.(amf, )
March 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge e-signed by counsel for Dft Andrew Saul. (amf, )
March 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge e-signed by counsel for Plf Willie McKenzie. (amf, )
March 5, 2020 Opinion or Order ***PURSUANT TO THE #7 CONSENT - Attorney James Joseph DuBois for Andrew Saul added. (No PDF attached to this entry) (amf, )
March 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Return Receipt Card showing service of Summons, #1 Complaint, & #3 Order, signed by Lawrence Beamon for U.S. Attorney's Office, served on 3/3/2020, answer due 6/1/2020 for Andrew Saul. (amf, )
March 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Andrew Saul, U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney General, & Social Security Office of Regional Counsel; mailed CMRRR with #1 Complaint & #3 Order. (amf, )
March 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; ORDER TO ANSWER Social Security Complaint within 90 days after the date of service of the complaint; plf to file brief in support within 40 days of filing of the answer; dft's reply brief and administrative record due within 30 days of brief filing; Copies mailed to counsel. Signed by Honorable Judge Susan Russ Walker on 3/2/2020. (amf, ) (Main Document 3 replaced on 3/2/2020 to reflect this case number as "1:20-cv-118" & not "2:20-cv-118") (amf, ). Modified on 3/2/2020 (amf, ).
February 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Willie McKenzie. (Attachments: #1 Application IFP)(es, )
February 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul, filed by Willie McKenzie. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(es, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McKenzie v. Saul (CONSENT)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Willie McKenzie
Represented By: Anna Ludlum King
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Represented By: James Joseph DuBois
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?