Corbitt v. Overstreet et al (INMATE 2)
| Jaquez Corbitt |
| D. Moodie, Anthony McClendon, C. Overstreet and Darren Moody |
| 1:2020cv00138 |
| February 25, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Stephen Michael Doyle |
| Myron H Thompson |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Mail Returned as Undeliverable; #14 Order sent to Jaquez Corbitt was returned with the following notation: "Return to Sender, Not at This Address". (No PDF attached to this entry) (amf, ) |
Filing 15
ORDER: it is ORDERED that on or before 4/24/2020, Plf shall file with the court a current address or SHOW CAUSE why this case should not be dismissed for his failure to adequately prosecute this action; further ORDERED that the directive in the court's #14 order, that Counsel for Dfts Overstreet and Moody advise the Court of whether Counsel will accept service and provide representation for Defendant McClendon is held in ABEYANCE pending Plf's compliance with this order. Signed by Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 4/14/2020. (amf, )
|
| Mail Returned as Undeliverable; #11 Order sent to Jaquez Corbitt was returned with the following notation: "Return to Sender, Not at This Address". (No PDF attached to this entry) (amf, ) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER: it is ORDERED that the #13 motion to quash summons is GRANTED; It appearing that Dft McClendon is no longer employed at the Dothan Police Department, it is ORDERED that: 1) On or before 4/29/2020, Counsel for Dfs Overstreet and Moody shall advise the Court of whether Counsel will accept service and provide representation for Defendant McClendon; 2) The answer and special report filing deadline set forth in the Court's #11 order as it relates to Dft McClendon is STAYED generally until further order; DIRECTING the Clerk to provide a copy of this order to Counsel for Dfs Overstreet and Moody; further DIRECTING the Clerk to take all necessary steps to amend the court docket to reflect that Defendant Moodie is correctly identified as Defendant Moody. Signed by Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 4/8/2020. (amf, )
|
| Filing 13 Limited Appearance, Notice to the Court and MOTION to Quash Summons by Anthony McClendon. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(White, Freddie) |
| Filing 12 (SUMMONS QUASHED PURSUANT TO THE COURT'S #14 ORDER) Return Receipt Card showing service of #1 Complaint, #4 Order, & #11 Order, signed by E. Johnson for Anthony McClendon, served on 3/30/2020, answer due 4/28/2020. (amf, ) Modified on 4/6/2020 to reflect the proper date served as 3/30 & not 4/6 (amf, ). Modified on 4/8/2020 (amf, ). |
|
Filing 11
ORDER: DIRECTING the CLERK to re-mail to Dft McClendon, by CMRRR to the Dothan Police Department, a copy of Documents #1 and #4 and to furnish Dft McClendon with a copy of this order; It is ORDERED that Dft McClendon is GRANTED an extension of time from 4/14/2020, to and including 4/28/2020, to file his answer and special report in accordance with the court's #4 order of procedure; further DIRECTING the Clerk to furnish a copy of this order to Plf and a copy of this order to counsel for Dts Overstreet and Moodie. Signed by Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 3/26/2020. (Copies furnished as directed) (amf, )
|
| Filing 10 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by D. Moodie. (White, Freddie) |
| Filing 9 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by C. Overstreet. (White, Freddie) |
| Filing 8 Special Report to Inmate 1983 Complaint by D. Moodie, C. Overstreet. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit A-1, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit B-1, #5 Exhibit B-2, #6 Exhibit B-3, #7 Exhibit C, #8 Exhibit D, #9 Exhibit D-1, #10 Exhibit D-2, #11 Exhibit D-3, #12 Exhibit D-4, #13 Exhibit E, #14 Exhibit E-1, #15 Exhibit E-2)(White, Freddie) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by D. Moodie, C. Overstreet.(White, Freddie) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/25/2020 to reflect the proper parties represented by counsel under the signature line: #1 Corrected Signature Page) (amf, ). Modified on 3/25/2020 (amf, ). |
| AO FORM 85 mailed to counsel for Dfts D. Moodie & C. Overstreet. (No PDF attached to this entry) (amf, ) |
| Filing 6 Return Receipt Card showing service of #1 Complaint & #4 Order, signed by Natalie Stonestreet for D. Moodie, served on 3/5/2020, answer due 4/14/2020. (amf, ) |
| Filing 5 Return Receipt Card showing service of #1 Complaint & #4 Order, signed by Natalie Stonestreet for C. Overstreet, served on 3/5/2020, answer due 4/14/2020. (amf, ) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER TO FILE SPECIAL REPORT AND ANSWER on or before 4/14/2020; copies mailed to plf; mailed by CMRRR with #1 complaint to the dfts. Signed by Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 3/3/2020. (amf, )
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER ON MOTION: ORDER granting #2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; Copies mailed to plf and account clerk at Houston County Jail. Signed by Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 3/3/2020. (Furnished: Cashier) (amf, )
|
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by Jaquez Corbitt. (imm, ) |
| Filing 1 Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against Anthony McClendon, D. Moodie, C. Overstreet, filed by Jaquez Corbitt. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents)(imm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
