Hatten v. Chadwick et al (INMATE 2)
Quincey Hatten |
John Crawford, Michael Chadwick, Cody Evan, Michael Bryad, Josh Wasden, Marlous Walker, Tyler Harrington and Michael Bryan |
1:2020cv00998 |
December 7, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Emily C Marks |
Kelly F Pate |
Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
No objections filed to the #4 Recommendation. (No PDF attached to this entry) (amf, ) |
Filing 4 RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE: it is the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that the Complaint be DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process under 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); Objections to R&R due by 1/11/2021. Signed by Honorable Judge Kelly F. Pate on 12/28/2020. (amf, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER granting #2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk at Dale County Jail. Signed by Honorable Judge Kelly F. Pate on 12/28/2020. (Furnished: Cashier) (amf, ) |
Filing 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by Quincey Hatten. (imm, ) |
Filing 1 Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against Michael Bryad, Michael Chadwick, John Crawford, Cody Evan, Tyler Harrington, Marlous Walker, Josh Wasden, filed by Quincey Hatten.(imm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.