Shipes v. Saul (CONSENT)
Plaintiff: Brandy Shipes
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Case Number: 1:2021cv00080
Filed: January 27, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Stephen Michael Doyle
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge E-signed by Counsel for Andrew Saul. (cwl, )
March 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge E-signed by Counsel for Brandy Shipes. (cwl, )
March 2, 2021 Opinion or Order ***PURSUANT TO THE #10 CONSENT - Attorney James Joseph DuBois for Andrew Saul added. (No pdf attached to this entry) (cwl, )
February 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Return Receipt Card showing service of #1 Complaint, #3 Order & #4 Summons Not signed for Andrew Saul, served on 2/16/2021. (cwl, )
February 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Return Receipt Card showing service of Summons, #1 Complaint, & #3 Order, signed by Emily Sase for U.S. Attorney General, served on 2/5/2021. (amf, )
February 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Return Receipt Card showing service of Summons, #1 Complaint, & #3 Order, signed by Antoine (Last Name Illegible) for Social Security Office of Regional Counsel, served on 2/2/2021. (amf, )
February 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Return Receipt Card showing service of Summons, #1 Complaint, & #3 Order, signed by Ray (Last Name Illegible) for U.S. Attorney's Office, served on 1/29/2021, answer due 4/29/2021 for Andrew Saul. (amf, )
January 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Andrew Saul, U.S. Attorney, Social Security Office of Regional Counsel, and U.S. Attorney General and mailed CMRRR w/copy of #1 Complaint & #3 Order. (am, )
January 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; ORDER TO ANSWER Social Security Complaint within 90 days after the date of service of the complaint; plaintiff to file brief in support within 40 days of filing of the answer; defendant's reply brief and administrative record due within 30 days of brief filing; Copies mailed to counsel. Signed by Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 1/28/2021. (amf, )
January 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Brandy Shipes. (Attachments: #1 Application IFP)(hrs, )
January 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul, filed by Brandy Shipes. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(hrs, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shipes v. Saul (CONSENT)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Represented By: James Joseph DuBois
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brandy Shipes
Represented By: Anna Ludlum King
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?