Sanders v. Valenza et al (INMATE 2)
Erik Thomas Sanders |
Bobby Hill, Lt. Jones, Donald J. Valenza and Sgt. Cain |
1:2021cv00141 |
February 17, 2021 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
W Harold Albritton |
Charles S Coody |
Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 Partial Filing fee received: $ 99.40, receipt number 4602062973. (wcl, ) |
Filing 15 ORDER ON MOTION granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time; Dfts are GRANTED an extension of time from 4/9/2021, to and including 5/19/2021, to file their answer and written report. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 4/9/2021. (wcl, ) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of ERROR re #9 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement, which has been STRICKEN as an erroneous docket entry, as further set out in the Notice; See docket entries #10 , #11 , #12 , and #13 for correct entry. (wcl, ) |
Filing 13 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Sgt. Cain. (Hill, Charles) |
Filing 12 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Lt. Jones. (Hill, Charles) |
Filing 11 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Donald J. Valenza. (Hill, Charles) |
Filing 10 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Bobby Hill. (Hill, Charles) |
Filing 9 (STRICKEN AS AN ERRONEOUS DOCKET ENTRY - SEE DOCS #10 , #11 , #12 & #13 FOR CORRECT ENTRY) Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Sgt. Cain, Bobby Hill, Lt. Jones, Donald J. Valenza. (Hill, Charles) Modified on 4/9/2021 (wcl, ). |
Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Special Report & Answer by Sgt. Cain, Bobby Hill, Lt. Jones, Donald J. Valenza. (Hill, Charles) |
***PURSUANT TO THE #8 MOTION - Attorney Ashley Hawkins Freeman for Sgt. Cain, Bobby Hill, Lt. Jones, and Donald J. Valenza added. (No pdf attached to this entry) (wcl, ) |
AO FORM 85 mailed to counsel for Sgt. Cain, Bobby Hill, Lt. Jones, Donald J. Valenza. (No pdf attached to this entry) (wcl, ) |
Filing 7 Return Receipt Card showing service of #1 Complaint and #4 Order signed by C22 KM for Donald J. Valenza served on 3/1/2021, answer due 4/9/2021. (bes, ) |
Filing 6 Return Receipt Card showing service of #1 Complaint and #4 Order signed by illegible for Bobby Hill served on 3/1/2021, answer due 4/9/2021. (bes, ) |
Filing 5 Return Receipt Card showing service of #1 Inmate 1983 Complaint and #4 Order signed by COVID 19, C22 KM for Lt. Jones served on 3/1/2021, answer due 4/9/2021. (wcl, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER TO FILE SPECIAL REPORT AND ANSWER on or before 4/9/2021; copies mailed to plf; mailed by CMRRR with complaint and any attachments to this pleading to dfts. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 2/26/2021. (wcl, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER ON MOTION granting #2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; Copies mailed to plf and account clerk at Houston County Jail. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 2/26/2021. (furn: Cashier) (wcl, ) |
Filing 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by Erik Thomas Sanders. (imm, ) Modified on 2/18/2021 to correct filed date to 2/17/2021 (qc/djy, ). |
Filing 1 Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against Sgt. Cain, Bobby Hill, Lt. Jones, Donald J. Valenza, filed by Erik Thomas Sanders.(imm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.