Thompson v. Valenza (INMATE 1)
Plaintiff: Marquis Rashad Thompson
Defendant: Donald J. Valenza and Donald Valenza
Case Number: 1:2021cv00685
Filed: October 12, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: W Harold Albritton
Referring Judge: Charles S Coody
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER ON MOTION: ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time; the Defendant shall file his Special Report as directed by prior #4 Order of this court on or before 1/9/2022. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 11/30/2021. (amf, )
November 30, 2021 Filing 8 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Donald Valenza. (Hill, Charles)
November 30, 2021 Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Special Report & Answer by Donald Valenza. (Hill, Charles)
November 30, 2021 AO FORM 85 mailed to counsel for Defendant Donald Valenza. (No PDF attached to this entry) (amf, )
November 30, 2021 ***PURSUANT TO THE #7 MOTION - Attorney Ashley Hawkins Freeman for Defendant Donald Valenza added. (No PDF attached to this entry) (amf, )
November 8, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE of Change of Address by Marquis Rashad Thompson (djy, )
October 25, 2021 Filing 5 Return Receipt Card showing service of #1 Complaint and #4 Order to File Special Report and Answer signed by Covid 19 for Donald J. Valenza served on 10/21/2021. (hfc, )
October 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER TO FILE SPECIAL REPORT AND ANSWER on or before 11/30/2021; copies mailed to plf; mailed by CMRRR with complaint to the individual named as Dft. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 10/19/2021. (hfc, )
October 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER ON MOTION: granting #2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; Copies mailed to plf and account clerk at Houston County Jail. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 10/19/2021. (furn: cashier) (hfc, )
October 12, 2021 Filing 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by Marquis Rashad Thompson. (bll, )
October 12, 2021 Filing 1 Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against Donald J. Valenza, filed by Marquis Rashad Thompson.(bll, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thompson v. Valenza (INMATE 1)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marquis Rashad Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Donald J. Valenza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Donald Valenza
Represented By: Ashley Hawkins Freeman
Represented By: Charles Richard Hill, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?