Byle v. Maggie Adams 1 (MAG+)
| Steven H. Byle |
| Maggie Adams 1 |
| 1:2021cv00696 |
| October 18, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| R Austin Huffaker |
| Kelly F Pate |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
REPLY to Response to Motion re #7 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Maggie Adams 1. (Etheredge, Stephen)
|
|
Filing 11
RESPONSE to Motion re #7 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Steven H. Byle. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(bes, )
|
|
Filing 10
Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Maggie Adams 1 re #8 Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement. (Etheredge, Stephen)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER: it is ORDERED that Plf must file a response by 11/24/2021, and show cause why the #7 Motion to Dismiss should not be granted; Dft may file a reply by 12/6/2021. Signed by Honorable Judge Kelly F. Pate on 11/5/2021. (bes, )
|
|
Filing 8
Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement sent to Maggie Adams 1; Corporate Disclosures due by 11/15/2021. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order and Sample Format)(bes, )
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Maggie Adams 1. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Etheredge, Stephen)
|
|
Filing 6
Return Receipt Card showing service of Summons and #1 Complaint signed by Staci Hartzog for Maggie Adams 1 served on 10/21/2021 (per USPS tracking website), answer due 11/12/2021. (bes, )
|
|
Filing 5
Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Steven H. Byle re #2 Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement. (bes, )
|
|
Filing 4
Summon Issued as to Maggie Adams 1; mailed by CMRRR with #1 Complaint. (es, )
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER REFERRING CASE: It is ORDERED that the above-styled action is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 USC 636 for further proceedings and determination or recommendation as may be appropriate. Signed by Honorable Judge R. Austin Huffaker, Jr on 10/20/2021. (bes, )
|
|
Filing 2
Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement sent to Steven H. Byle; Corporate Disclosures due by 11/1/2021. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order and Sample Format)(bes, )
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Maggie Adams 1 ( Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number 4602064967.), filed by Steven H. Byle. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Receipt)(bes, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Byle v. Maggie Adams 1 (MAG+) | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Steven H. Byle | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Maggie Adams 1 | |
| Represented By: | Stephen Talmadge Etheredge, Sr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
