Tew v. The City of Dothan et al
Samuel A. Tew |
The City of Dothan, The City Commission of the City of Dothan, Taiwan Truitt, Scott Spivey, Devellus Butler, Brian Goguen and Brian Tate |
1:2022cv00092 |
February 22, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Kelly F Pate |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 RULE 26(f) ORDER: it is ORDERED that the parties confer and submit a report based on the trial terms and scheduling order requirements of the Middle District of Alabama, as further set out in order. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 5/3/2022. Counsel for the parties are DIRECTED to complete the appropriate attached form and send it to the Clerk of the Court by 5/3/2022, as further set out in order. Neither the consent form nor the request for reassignment form should be filed electronically. Signed by Honorable Judge Kelly F. Pate on 4/12/2022. (cwl, ) |
Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Devellus Butler, Brian Goguen, Scott Spivey, Brian Tate, The City Commission of the City of Dothan, The City of Dothan, Taiwan Truitt.(Pike, James) |
Filing 10 TEXT ORDER: GRANTING #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer; Answer due by 4/11/2022. Signed by Honorable Judge Kelly F. Pate on 3/17/2022. (No PDF attached to this entry) (es, ) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge sent to counsel for (All Dfts) Devellus Butler, Brian Goguen, Scott Spivey, Brian Tate, The City Commission of the City of Dothan, The City of Dothan, Taiwan Truitt. (es, ) |
Filing 8 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Devellus Butler, Brian Goguen, Scott Spivey, Brian Tate, The City Commission of the City of Dothan, The City of Dothan, Taiwan Truitt. (Pike, James) |
Filing 7 Consent MOTION to Extend Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to the #1 Complaint, by Devellus Butler, Brian Goguen, Scott Spivey, Brian Tate, The City Commission of the City of Dothan, The City of Dothan, Taiwan Truitt. (Pike, James) Modified on 3/16/2022 clarified text as to pleading (es, ). |
Filing 6 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Samuel A. Tew re #3 Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement. (McPhillips, Julian) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed; The City of Dothan, Devellus Butler, Brian Goguen, Brian Tate, Scott Spivey, Taiwan Truitt, The City Commission of the City of Dothan, served on 2/28/2022, answer due 3/21/2022. (es, ) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge sent to counsel for (plf) Samuel A. Tew. (es, ) |
Filing 3 Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement sent to Samuel A. Tew; Corporate Disclosures due by 3/10/2022. (Attachments: #1 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Attachment)(es, ) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to The City of Dothan, The City Commission of the City of Dothan, Taiwan Truitt, Scott Spivey, Devellus Butler, Brian Goguen, Brian Tate & returned to counsel for personal service by process server. (es, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Devellus Butler, Brian Goguen, Scott Spivey, Brian Tate, The City Commission of the City of Dothan, The City of Dothan, Taiwan Truitt ( Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number 4602066058.), filed by Samuel A. Tew. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Filing Fee)(es, ) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Samuel A. Tew. (No PDF attached to this entry - See doc #1 ) (es, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.