Flagg v. Houston County Sheriff's Department et al (INMATE 2)
Andrea Duhreal Flagg and Andre D. Flagg-El |
Houston County Sheriff's Department, Houston County Jail, Donald Valenza, William Raffery, James Brazier, Kelita Moore, Kimile Company and NCIS |
1:2022cv00272 |
May 3, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
W Harold Albritton |
Charles S Coody |
Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 4 MOTION to Proceed, considered as a Motion for Extension of Time, pursuant to the Court's #5 Order, by Andrea Duhreal Flagg. (es, ) Modified on 6/15/2022 (es, ). |
![]() |
Filing 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by Andrea Duhreal Flagg. (hrs, ) |
Filing 1 Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against James Brazier, Houston County Jail, Houston County Sheriff's Department, Kimile Company, Kelita Moore, NCIS, William Raffery, Donald Valenza, filed by Andrea Duhreal Flagg.(hrs, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/14/2022: #1 original signature pages) (es, ). |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Andrea Duhreal Flagg.(No PDF document attached - see docket entry #1 ). (hrs, ) |
MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Andrea Duhreal Flagg.(No PDF document attached - see docket entry #1 ).(hrs, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.