United States of America v. McCormick et al
| United States of America |
| Sherry McCormick |
| Office of Congressman Barry Moore |
| 1:2022mc03989 |
| October 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Emily C Marks |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Certified Mail Returned as Undeliverable; Copy of #7 Order sent to Sherry McCormick returned with the following USPS notation, "Return to Sender; Unclaimed; Unable to Forward." (NO PDF attached to this entry) (am, )
|
|
Filing 11
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED that the #5 Writ of Garnishment issued and served upon the Garnishee is GRANTED; The United States is entitled to garnish up to 25% of McCormick's wages because she has failed to establish any claim for exemption, as further set out in Order. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 11/16/2022. (am, )
|
|
Filing 10
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Chief Judge Emily C. Marks: Writ Hearing held on 11/9/2022 (PDF available for court use only). (Court Reporter Katie Silas.) (ag, )
|
|
Supplement to its RESPONSE to #8 MOTION for Hearing filed by United States of America (NO PDF - See doc #9 , which was incorrectly filed as a Motion. (am, )
|
|
Filing 9
(Supplement Response) MOTION to Substitute Unsigned Declaration by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Signed Declaration)(Wadsworth, Stephen) Modified on 11/10/2022 (am, ).
|
|
Filing 8
Opposition in Response to #6 Motion for Hearing filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Declaration)(Wadsworth, Stephen) Modified on 11/8/2022 to remove incorrect events & clarify text (am, ).
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER: On 11/3/2022, the Defendant filed a claim for exemption and a motion for a hearing (doc. #6 ). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 3205(c)(5), and upon consideration of the Defendant's claim for exemption and motion for a hearing, it is ORDERED that the motion for a hearing (doc. #6 ) is GRANTED and this matter is set for a hearing (Writ Hearing) on 11/9/2022 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 2A, at the FMJJ/USCC, Montgomery, AL before Chief Judge Emily C. Marks. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to provide a court reporter. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 11/3/2022. Furnished calendar, WS. Copies mailed regular mail and CMRRR to Sherry McCormick and Office of Congressman Barry Moore. (dmn, ) Modified on 11/3/2022 to include mailed regular mail and CMRRR text. (dmn, )
|
|
Filing 6
CLAIM for Exemption by Sherry McCormick. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(am, )
|
|
MOTION for Hearing by Sherry McCormick. (NO PDF - See doc #6 ) (am, )
|
|
Filing 5
WRIT of Garnishment Returned Executed by USM Acknowledgment of Service as to Office of Congressman Barry Moore, served 10/18/2022. (dmn, )
|
|
Filing 4
WRIT of Garnishment Returned Executed by USM Acknowledgement of Service as to Sherry McCormick, served 10/18/2022. (dmn, )
|
|
Filing 3
WRIT OF GARNISHMENT issued & furnished to USMS for service. (amf, )
|
|
Filing 2
Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement filed by United States of America. (amf, )
|
|
Filing 1
APPLICATION for Writ of Garnishment, filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Instructions to the Garnishee, #2 Notice of Garnishment and Instructions to Debtor, #3 Claim for Exemption Form, #4 Proposed Writ, #5 Answer of Garnishee)(amf, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
