Noah v. Kijakazi (CONSENT)
Plaintiff: Andrea Kay Noah
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Case Number: 1:2023cv00028
Filed: January 12, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Kelly F Pate
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 TEXT ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Signed by Honorable Judge Kelly F. Pate on 3/9/2023. (no pdf attached) (cwl, )
March 8, 2023 Opinion or Order ***PURSUANT TO THE #6 MOTION - Attorney Arthurice Brundidge for Kilolo Kijakazi added. (no pdf attached) (cwl, )
March 8, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Kilolo Kijakazi. (DuBois, James)
January 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge e-signed by Counsel for Kilolo Kijakazi. (cwl, )
January 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge e-signed by Counsel for Andrea Kay Noah. (cwl, )
January 30, 2023 Opinion or Order ***PURSUANT TO THE #5 CONSENT - Attorney James Joseph DuBois for Kilolo Kijakazi added. (no pdf attached) (cwl, )
January 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEDULING ORDER: it is ORDERED that the #2 motion is GRANTED; the Commissioner's Answer to Social Security Complaint and Administrative Record are due within 60 days after entry of the Clerk's notice of service; plaintiff to file brief in support within 30 days of filing of the answer and administrative record; defendant's responsive brief due within 30 days of plaintiff's brief filing; plaintiff may file a reply brief within 14 days of responsive brief filing. Signed by Honorable Judge Kelly F. Pate on 1/13/2023(es, )
January 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Notice: Social Security Case Service - Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 USC 405(g), the Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Case Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system, notifying the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration's Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the case. No Summons shall issue. Kilolo Kijakazi answer due 3/14/2023.( NO PDF attached to this entry) (es, )
January 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Andrea Kay Noah. (Attachments: #1 Application IFP)(zhp, )
January 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kilolo Kijakazi, filed by Andrea Kay Noah. 90 day Rule 4m deadline set for 4/12/2023. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(zhp, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Noah v. Kijakazi (CONSENT)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andrea Kay Noah
Represented By: Walter Allen Blakeney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Represented By: Arthurice Brundidge
Represented By: James Joseph DuBois
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?