Key v. Downs et al (INMATE 2)
Plaintiff: David Mar' Kel Key and David Markel Key
Defendant: Spencer Downs, James Brazier, Ivry James, Officer Spots and Officer Hardye
Case Number: 1:2023cv00109
Filed: February 27, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Charles S Coody
Referring Judge: R Austin Huffaker
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: DENYING Plaintiff's #6 Motion for Appointment of Counsel, as further set out in Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Coody on 3/28/2023. (am, )
March 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: 1. By 4/11/2023, Plaintiff must file an amended complaint that cures the deficiencies identified in this Order; 2. Plaintiff must file his amended complaint on the Court's 1983 form, which he must fill out completely; 3. The amended complaint filed in response to this Order will supersede all previous complaints, as further set out in Order; DIRECTING the Clerk to send Plaintiff a copy of the prisoner 1983 form and this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles S. Coody on 3/28/2023. (mailed w/1983 form, as directed)(am, )
March 27, 2023 Filing 6 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by David Markel Key. (am, )
March 22, 2023 Filing 5 [STRICKEN, WRONG EVENT CODE SELECTED, see CORRECTED DOCKET ENTRY] AMENDED COMPLAINT against James Brazier, Spencer Downs, Officer Hardye, Ivry James, Officer Spots, filed by David Markel Key. (Attachments: #1 Amended Complaint)(dmn, ) Modified on 3/22/2023 (dmn, ).
March 22, 2023 Amended Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against James Brazier, Spencer Downs, Officer Hardye, Ivry James, Officer Spots, filed by David Markel Key.(dmn, ) (no pdf, see Doc. #5 )
March 16, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: The Complaint is before the Court for screening under 28 U.S.C. 1915. Upon review, the Court finds the Complaint contains pleading deficiencies which Plaintiff will be granted an opportunity to correct. It is ORDERED that by 3/30/2023, Plaintiff must file an amended complaint as further set out in the order. To aid Plaintiff in filing a response to this Order, the Clerk is DIRECTED to provide him with a copy of the form used by prisoners to file 1983 complaints. Plaintiff must use this form in filing his amended complaint. The amended complaint will supersede the original complaint. Thus, this case will proceed only against the defendants named and claims presented in the amended complaint. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 3/16/2023. Copy with 1983 Inmate Complaint form mailed to Plaintiff as directed. (dmn, )
March 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: GRANTING Plaintiff's #2 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk at Houston County Jail. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 3/10/2023. (Furnished: Cashier & Account Clerk @ HCJ) (am, )
February 27, 2023 Filing 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by David Mar' Kel Key. (hrr, )
February 27, 2023 Filing 1 Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against James Brazier, Spencer Downs, Officer Hardye, Ivry James, Officer Spots, filed by David Mar' Kel Key.(hrr, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Key v. Downs et al (INMATE 2)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Mar' Kel Key
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Markel Key
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Spencer Downs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Brazier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ivry James
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officer Spots
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officer Hardye
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?