Kallas v. Coffee County, Alabama
Michael Kallas |
Coffee County Alabama |
1:2024cv00690 |
October 30, 2024 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Coffee County Alabama ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AALMDC-3735307.), filed by Michael Kallas. 90 day Rule 4m deadline set for 1/28/2025. (Ellzey, Charles) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Kallas v. Coffee County, Alabama | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Michael Kallas | |
Represented By: | Charles Hudson Ellzey |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Coffee County Alabama | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.