Harrell v. Bisignano (CONSENT)
| Amy Harrell |
| Frank Bisignano |
| 1:2025cv00621 |
| August 8, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Stephen Michael Doyle |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support re #1 Complaint, filed by Amy Harrell. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: IQ Testing) (King, Anna)
|
|
Filing 15
CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Frank Bisignano, Amy Harrell.. (no pdf) (AM)
|
|
Filing 14
TEXT ORDER: Upon consideration of the unopposed Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. #13 ), it is ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff may file her brief on or before January 27, 2026. Entered by Magistrate Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 12/23/2025. (WCL)
|
|
Filing 13
Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Plaintiff's Brief by Amy Harrell. (King, Anna)
|
|
Filing 12
NOTICE of Assignment to U.S. Magistrate Judge and Form to Decline Consent to the U.S. Magistrate Judge sent to counsel for (ALL PARTIES) Frank Bisignano, Amy Harrell. Declination of Consent to Magistrate Judge due by 12/24/2025. (Attachments: #1 General Standing Order)(AM) (Attachment 1 replaced on 12/5/2025 to attach correct Standing Order; Regenerated to parties) (AM).
|
|
Filing 11
TEXT ORDER: On October 21, 2025, this Court entered a General Order in Miscellaneous Case No. 25-4043 staying civil litigation related to the United States in light of the lapse of appropriations. Appropriations were restored on November 12, 2025. Accordingly, the stay previously entered in this case has been LIFTED effective November 12, 2025. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 12/3/2025. (AM)
|
|
Filing 10
Social Security Transcript of Administrative Proceedings by Frank Bisignano. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 002- Court Trans index, #2 Exhibit 003- Docs related to admin, #3 Exhibit 004- payment docs and dec, #4 Exhibit 005- Jurs docs and notice, #5 Exhibit 006- Non dis related dev, #6 Exhibit 007- Dis related dev, #7 Exhibit 008- Medical Records) (DuBois, James)
|
|
Filing 9
ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Frank Bisignano. (Smith, Rylan)
|
|
Filing 8
GENERAL ORDER 25mc4043 staying civil litigation related to the United States in light of lapse of appropriations. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 10/21/2025. (AM)
|
|
Filing 7
TEXT ORDER: Upon consideration of the Motion to Stay (Doc. #5 ), it is ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED and this case is STAYED until funding is restored to the Department of Justice by Congress. Entered by Magistrate Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 10/3/2025. (HRR)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Assignment to U.S. Magistrate Judge and Form to Decline Consent to the U.S. Magistrate Judge sent to counsel for (ALL PARTIES) Frank Bisignano, Amy Harrell. Declination of Consent to Magistrate Judge due by 10/22/2025. (Attachments: #1 General Order)(AM)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION to Stay by Frank Bisignano. (DuBois, James)
|
|
Filing 4
SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEDULING ORDER: the motion (Doc. #2 ) is GRANTED; the Commissioner's Answer to Social Security Complaint and Administrative Record are due within 60 days after entry of the Clerk's notice of service; plaintiff to file brief in support within 30 days of filing of the answer and administrative record; defendant's responsive brief due within 30 days of plaintiff's brief filing; plaintiff may file a reply brief within 14 days of responsive brief filing. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 8/8/2025. (SCN)
|
|
Filing 3
Case Assigned to Magistrate Judge Stephen Michael Doyle. (NO PDF) (AM)
|
|
Filing 2
Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by Amy Harrell. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (King, Anna)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Frank Bisignano, filed by Amy Harrell. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons, #5 Proposed Summons) (King, Anna) Modified on 8/8/2025 to remove Rule 4m deadline (AM).
|
|
Notice: Social Security Case Service - Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 USC 405(g), the Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Case Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system, notifying the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration's Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the case. No Summons shall issue. Frank Bisignano answer due 10/7/2025. (AM)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Harrell v. Bisignano (CONSENT) | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Amy Harrell | |
| Represented By: | Anna Ludlum King |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Frank Bisignano | |
| Represented By: | James Joseph DuBois |
| Represented By: | Rylan Lawrence Smith |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
