-CSC Price v. USA (INMATE 3)

-CSC Price v. USA (INMATE 3)

Plaintiff:	David G. Price
Defendant:	United States of America
Case Number:	2:1999cv01183
Filed:	October 4, 1999
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office:	Montgomery Office
County:	XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:	Charles S. Coody
Presiding Judge:	Mark E. Fuller
Nature of Suit:	Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 21, 2010	Filing 28 ORDER; that (1) The petitioner's Objection to the Magistrate Judge Recommendation 26 filed on November 22, 2010 is overruled; (2) The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge 25 entered on November 5, 2010 is adopted; (3) Price&# 039;s motion for relief from judgment is DISMISSED as a successive § 2255 motion insofar as his conviction and sentence are being collaterally attacked, and to the extent Price's claims allege fraud upon the court pursuant to Rule 60(d)(3) is DENIED, and the judgment denying his original § 2255 motion stands. Signed by Hon. Chief Judge Mark E. Fuller on 12/21/2010. (jg, )
November 5, 2010	Filing 25 RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE; that Price's instant motion be dismissed as a successive § 2255 motion insofar as his conviction and sentence are being collaterally attacked, and to the extent Price's claims allege fraud upon t he court pursuant to Rule 60(d)(3) be denied, and the judgment denying his original § 2255 motion stand; that the parties shall file any objections to this Recommendation on or before November 19, 2010. Signed by Honorable Charles S. Coody on 11/5/2010. (jg, )

Date Filed

Document Text

December 21, 2010

Filing 28 ORDER; that (1) The petitioner's Objection to the Magistrate Judge Recommendation 26 filed on November 22, 2010 is overruled; (2) The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge 25 entered on November 5, 2010 is adopted; (3) Price&# 039;s motion for relief from judgment is DISMISSED as a successive § 2255 motion insofar as his conviction and sentence are being collaterally attacked, and to the extent Price's claims allege fraud upon the court pursuant to Rule 60(d)(3) is DENIED, and the judgment denying his original § 2255 motion stands. Signed by Hon. Chief Judge Mark E. Fuller on 12/21/2010. (jg, )

November 5, 2010

Filing 25 RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE; that Price's instant motion be dismissed as a successive § 2255 motion insofar as his conviction and sentence are being collaterally attacked, and to the extent Price's claims allege fraud upon t he court pursuant to Rule 60(d)(3) be denied, and the judgment denying his original § 2255 motion stand; that the parties shall file any objections to this Recommendation on or before November 19, 2010. Signed by Honorable Charles S. Coody on 11/5/2010. (jg, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: -CSC Price v. USA (INMATE 3)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: David G. Price
Represented By:	Jeffery Clyde Duffey
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Represented By:	Stephen P. Feaga
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?