Rogers, et al v. State Personnel Dept, et al
Case Number: 2:2000cv00109
Filed: February 3, 2000
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office: Montgomery Office
Presiding Judge: Vanzetta P. McPherson
Presiding Judge: Myron H. Thompson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 12, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 131 ORDER Jury Selection set for 6/26/2006 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2E before Honorable Myron H. Thompson ; Jury Trial set for 6/26/2006 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2E before Honorable Myron H. Thompson. Signed by Judge Myron H. Thompson on 4/12/2006. furn. yg, hc, sc(ag, )
March 23, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 130 JUDGMENT denying 95 Motion for Summary Judgment as to the 2000 promotion to the extent plaintiff seeks prospective injunctive relief from the defendants in their official capacities ; that said motion is granted in all other respects ; directing the clerk of court to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Judge Myron H. Thompson on 3/23/2006. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(ag, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rogers, et al v. State Personnel Dept, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?