Franklin v. Premiere Refreshment
Plaintiff: Ellis Franklin
Defendant: Premiere Refreshment Service
Case Number: 2:2001cv00637
Filed: September 15, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office: Montgomery Office
Presiding Judge: Ira De Ment
Presiding Judge: Susan Russ Walker
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 15, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDERED that 14 Rule 60(b) Motion for Relief is DENIED. It is further ORDERED that the Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis in this closed case is DENIED as untimely. Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 9/15/2009. (cb, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Franklin v. Premiere Refreshment
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ellis Franklin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Premiere Refreshment Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?