Joiner v. Montgomery Police Department et al (INMATE2)
Case Number: 2:2005cv00661
Filed: July 14, 2005
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office: Montgomery Office
Presiding Judge: Delores R. Boyd
Presiding Judge: Ira De Ment
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 20, 2005 Opinion or Order Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Inmate 1983 Complaint filed by Henry Joiner that Plaintiff's 1983 claims against the Montgomery City Jail and the Montgomery Police Department be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). To the extent Plaintiff's complaint challenges the constitutionality of a conviction and/or sentence imposed upon him by a state and/or city court located in Montgomery, AL in February 2005, these claims be dismissed without p rejudice pursuant to the directives of 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); and this case be dismissed prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii). Objections to R&R due by 8/1/2005. Signed by Judge Delores R. Boyd on 7/20/2005. (dmn)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Joiner v. Montgomery Police Department et al (INMATE2)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?