M.C. v. Pactiv Corporation, et al (LEAD CASE)

Justia Dockets & Filings Eleventh Circuit Alabama Middle District M.C. v. Pactiv Corporation, et al (LEAD CASE)

M.C. v. Pactiv Corporation, et al (LEAD CASE)

Case Number:	2:2006cv00083
Filed:	January 30, 2006
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office:	Montgomery Office
Presiding Judge:	Charles S. Coody
Presiding Judge:	Lyle E. Strom
Nature of Suit:	P.I.: Other
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By:	Both

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 3, 2008	Filing 453 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ORDERING and ADJUDGING: (1) the 447 joint motion for order approving settlement agreement is hereby granted and the Court approves the Settlement Agreement, deems it as having been reached by all parties and counsel in good faith, and deems it binding and enforceable as to all parties;(2) notwithstanding any dismissals in any Related Cases and/or the conclusion of this litigation, the Court shall retain jurisdiction over the settlement of these Related Cases, the A mended Settlement Agreement, and all claims and disputes arising with respect thereto, including all claims and disputes as to the Amended Settlement Agreements enforceability or any of its terms; (3) any violation of any terms of the Amended Settlem ent Agreement determined by this Court to have been in bad faith shall also be deemed an intentional violation of this Order, as further set out in order; (4) that this Order applies to this and all Related Cases; (5) That the parties 449 joint motion to dismiss with prejudice is granted and this case and the Related Cases are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Lyle E. Strom on 10/3/08. (djy, )

Date Filed

Document Text

October 3, 2008

Filing 453 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ORDERING and ADJUDGING: (1) the 447 joint motion for order approving settlement agreement is hereby granted and the Court approves the Settlement Agreement, deems it as having been reached by all parties and counsel in good faith, and deems it binding and enforceable as to all parties;(2) notwithstanding any dismissals in any Related Cases and/or the conclusion of this litigation, the Court shall retain jurisdiction over the settlement of these Related Cases, the A mended Settlement Agreement, and all claims and disputes arising with respect thereto, including all claims and disputes as to the Amended Settlement Agreements enforceability or any of its terms; (3) any violation of any terms of the Amended Settlem ent Agreement determined by this Court to have been in bad faith shall also be deemed an intentional violation of this Order, as further set out in order; (4) that this Order applies to this and all Related Cases; (5) That the parties 449 joint motion to dismiss with prejudice is granted and this case and the Related Cases are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Lyle E. Strom on 10/3/08. (djy, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: M.C. v. Pactiv Corporation, et al (LEAD CASE)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?