Bennefield v. Bullock State Prison et al (INMATE1)
Case Number: 2:2006cv00307
Filed: April 5, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office: Montgomery Office
Presiding Judge: Mark E. Fuller
Presiding Judge: Susan Russ Walker
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 12, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that: 1. The plaintiff's claims against Bullock State Prison be dismissed prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); 2. This correctional facility be dismissed as a defendant in this cause of action; 3. This case, with respect to defendants O'Hara and Morris, be referred back to the undersigned for appropriate proceedings. Objections to R&R due by 4/25/2006. Signed by Judge Susan Russ Walker on 4/12/2006. (cc, )
April 6, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER granting 2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order.Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full as further set out; Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk at BCCF; furnish: cashier . Signed by Judge Susan Russ Walker on 4/6/06. (vma, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bennefield v. Bullock State Prison et al (INMATE1)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?